Willkommen Gast | RSS Mittwoch
21.11.2018, 00:28
Hauptseite Registrierung Login
Menü
Suche
Kalender
«  Mai 2012  »
Mo.Di.Mi.Do.Fr.Sa.So.
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031
Freunde
  • Website erstellen
  • Dein Online Desktop
  • Kostenlose Online Spiele
  • Video Tutorials
  • Statistik

    Insgesamt online: 1
    Gäste: 1
    Benutzer: 0
    Weather in Swiss
    Hauptseite » 2012 » Mai » 31 » Facebook ,fraud which involved 750 million people...
    18:38
    Facebook ,fraud which involved 750 million people...
    Over the past few years, social media has ballooned from a small, emerging market into a major force in the online marketing and advertising space. However, those who lived through the dotcom boom-and-bust cycle can't help asking whether we are about to see another bubble burst.After all, the hype about social media has quickly become inflated, more brands are throwing resources into interacting with customers on social media, and there is still no real clarity about how most social networking sites are going to monetise the massive user bases they have built, outside of advertising.At what point, ask sceptics, will investors become unwilling to pour their money into these websites? When will brands start to become disillusioned with their returns from advertising on social networks and using them as platforms to interact with their customers?At what point will users start leaving social networks in their droves, either out of boredom or because of concerns about how their confidential data is handled by websites such as Facebook? The fact that an increasing number of people are asking those questions certainly seems to indicate that the social media market will soon go through a period of readjustment.However, I don't believe that we'll see the bubble burst as dramatically as it did in the early 2000s when the dotcom market imploded. Instead, we'll see businesses and consumers alike gradually integrate social media into their everyday lives until it simply becomes one of the many channels they use for everyday communication. I'd describe that as a market normalising rather than as a bubble bursting.There are a number of reasons that the bubble will not burst dramatically as it did during the dotcom collapse, starting with the fact that the barriers to entry into social network are relatively low for most brands.Advertising on Facebook isn't prohibitively expensive neither is it difficult or costly to set up a profile on Twitter. Most brands could easily cut their losses and disengage if they had to. Rather than fretting about whether social networking is a bubble waiting to burst, companies need to look at ways to put social networks to work for them.One of the reasons that we might go through, what Gartner would call a trough of disillusionment, in the social networking arena is simply that many brands are not leveraging it as effectively as they could.Social media is a great channel for starting relationships with customers and a good one for maintaining (sometimes even repairing) relationships. It's also good for holding conversations with customers and influencers, using software such as CoTweet.This is important customer relationship management work, yet many businesses have outsourced social networking interactions to a Public Relations agency. Other have tasked a junior staff member with looking after this function, reasoning that someone from Generation Y will get this social networking stuff.Organisations should instead be treating it more strategically and aligning it more closely with their other marketing and customer service channels.That doesn't mean that they should overinvest in social media or overvalue social media relationships, but simply that they should manage it as a part of the business.After all, Facebook recently passed the milestone of 500 million users worldwide. Social media might not be the only part of the online landscape, or even the most important one, but it certainly looks like it's here to stay.Contributed By Richard Mullins, director at Acceleration

    Even as the stock market pounds Facebook's freshly issued shares, analysts and techies are still defending the newest public company. After Friday's debacle, which was in part caused by technical glitches, which Nasdaq says it has now fixed, the Facebook sympathizers told us to wait. Day one wouldn't tell the whole story. But Facebook's second day on the market hasn't eased our fears that we're in a social media bubble. In fact, it only suggests the bubble is coming to its end.

    RELATED: Instagram Was Mark Zuckerberg's Last Hurrah as Facebook's Hacker King


    At this very moment, the stock is trading at around $34, down about 11 percent from its already IPO price of $38. Even with those numbers, apologists like Business Insider's Nicholas Carlson are still backing the stock and the company.

    FB's pre-IPO internal valuation was $75bn, so employees hired recently are still above water.

    — Nicholas Carlson (@nichcarlson) May 21, 2012

    If FB can manage the morale hit of a lower stock price, this is good for the company. Lower strikes prices make recruiting easier.

    — Nicholas Carlson (@nichcarlson) May 21, 2012


    These demonstrate the two lines of thinking that have justified this big drop. Facebook is still a huge company that has made a lot of people very rich. And this dive is actually, in some ways, good for Facebook -- just wait, they say, it will get better. Neither of these explanations quite explain how Facebook will recover. And while this reasoning has a whole lot to say about Facebook and its billionaires, what about the rest of the social media bubble?

    RELATED: Why Mark Zuckerberg Needs His Hoodie


    To that first point, yes, Facebook's rich. Even at these prices, Facebook's still big and its millionaires are still millionaires. But, as we've noted, that doesn't help anyone but Facebook. Or, really, anyone but Mark Zuckerberg, as James Surowiecki explains in his New Yorker column this week. This is aselfish social media bubble. TechCrunch's Alexander Haislip reiterated this point quite well over the weekend. "Facebook’s rise is great for Zuck, but unless you’re among a privileged few, it isn’t good for you," he wrote, explaining that the social network doesn't add much to the economy -- a point we've made before. From Haislip:

    The wealth created by Facebook gets concentrated into the hands of a few—some of whom have refused to pay taxes on their gains—instead of being recycled into the greater economy. And the computer makers that supply Facebook rely on components imported from other countries, sending capital abroad and weakening our balance of trade.

    And with the stock going the way it is, not only will the rest of the economy miss out on the benefits of a bubble, but other social media companies will miss out, too. Facebook's big IPO debut was supposed to further hype social media as a thing in which to invest. When Facebook got its big valuation, the stock market was supposed to eat up anything "social media." Facebook's thud just ruined those chances for everyone else. We saw how Facebook's stock effected Zynga on Friday. Even if Facebook recovers and goes on to be the next Apple of the stock market, the rest of the social media world won't.

    RELATED: Pinterest's Scary Big $1.5 Billion Valuation


    But, it's not even clear Facebook will recover. See, there's another selfish thing about the social network: It doesn't add much of anything to the world. Facebook claims its mission is to connect people. But, as Haislip notes (and as The Atlantic's Alexis Madrigal noted before him), boiled down, it just sells advertising.

    Facebook sells advertising—it may be the most effective advertising platform since Google, or not—but that’s not the best use of the brightest minds of our generation. Advertising doesn’t improve our balance of trade. It doesn’t lift people out of poverty. It doesn’t employ the modestly skilled. It doesn’t extend life expectancies or take away pain. It doesn’t improve our standard of living.

    And, that one thing it's good at, it doesn't do very well. "The problem with Facebook and other social media is that they were not designed to carry advertising," writes Ad Age's Rance Crain, explaining that businesses don't see Facebook's utility in ad buys. General Motors, for example, pulled its $10 million ad campaign because it didn't really see Facebook as an advertising platform. "We've found Facebook ads to be very effective when strategically combined with engagement, great content and innovative ways of storytelling, rather than treating them as a straight advertising buy," Ford said in a statement. Advertising is Facebook's business model, according to its S1, that's how it plans on growing and making money.

    RELATED: Internet Delights in Facebook IPO Filing's Juicy Details


    And then there's that second point, which is basically a "just you wait" mentality, with people finding justifications for today's fall while simultaneously predicting a future rise. We can find other reasons, besides Facebook's lack of intrinsic value, that the stock has taken a dive. As Gizmodo's Brian Barrettnotes, those Morgan Stanley analysts couldn't hold up the stock price forever. Today we're just seeing a leveling off that would have happened on Friday, if those bankers had not intervened.Epicurean Dealmaker, a finance blogger, also reminds that the stock still needs to level off, in the following tweet. "Short answer: the price action in Facebook Friday and today DOES NOT REPRESENT TRUE MARKET DEMAND." Dan Scholnick, an investor at Trinity Partners, explains over at TechCrunch that a low IPO means good things for Facebook, ending with this lesson: "The best investments are determined over months and years, not hours and days." AllThingsD's Mike Issac has a similar sentiment at the end of his post describing the stock free-fall.

    Here’s the thing: Like Benchmark Capital’s Bill Gurley reminds, Amazon’s debut saw the stock break issue and stay below its IPO price for months.

    It then went on — over the long haul — to rise 1000x.

    Amazon, too, came of age during tech bubble 1.0 and has since recovered, it's true. But, Amazon sells real things -- it has a business model that works. All of the above reasoning explains why the stock is tanking, from a financial, market perspective. We don't see anything in there about recovery. And, even if Facebook pulls an Amazon, the rest of the social media world has already lost its opportunity.

    Aufrufe: 1069 | Hinzugefügt von: Swissiman | Bewertung: 0.0/0
    Kommentare insgesamt: 0
    Nur registrierte Benutzer können Kommentare hinzufügen.
    [ Registrierung | Login ]

    Copyright MyCorp © 2018 Яндекс.Метрика